{"id":480,"date":"2023-02-21T01:26:50","date_gmt":"2023-02-21T01:26:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/wolfcreekarcheology.com\/?page_id=480"},"modified":"2023-02-24T03:51:01","modified_gmt":"2023-02-24T03:51:01","slug":"elem-points","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/wolfcreekarcheology.com\/?page_id=480","title":{"rendered":"Elem Points"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<div class=\"wp-block-stackable-columns stk-block-columns stk-block stk-d5db3a3\" data-block-id=\"d5db3a3\"><div class=\"stk-row stk-inner-blocks stk-block-content stk-content-align stk-d5db3a3-column\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-stackable-column stk-block-column stk-block-column--v3 stk-column stk-block-column--v2 stk-block stk-51b6e4d\" data-block-id=\"51b6e4d\"><div class=\"stk-column-wrapper stk-block-column__content stk-container stk-51b6e4d-container stk--no-background stk--no-padding\"><div class=\"stk-block-content stk-inner-blocks stk-51b6e4d-inner-blocks\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-stackable-columns stk-block-columns stk-block stk-b075ebd\" data-block-id=\"b075ebd\"><div class=\"stk-row stk-inner-blocks stk-block-content stk-content-align stk-b075ebd-column\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-stackable-column stk-block-column stk-block-column--v3 stk-column stk-block-column--v2 stk-block stk-347c83a\" data-block-id=\"347c83a\"><style>.stk-347c83a-container{background-image:url(https:\/\/wolfcreekarcheology.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/point7-81.jpg) !important;background-attachment:fixed !important;background-size:cover !important}.stk-347c83a-container:before{background-color:#000000 !important;opacity:0.5 !important}<\/style><div class=\"stk-column-wrapper stk-block-column__content stk-container stk-347c83a-container stk-hover-parent stk--has-background-overlay\"><div class=\"stk-block-content stk-inner-blocks stk-347c83a-inner-blocks\">\n<p class=\"has-text-align-center has-luminous-vivid-amber-color has-text-color has-x-large-font-size\"><strong>Elem Points<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-stackable-columns stk-block-columns stk-block stk-fe1bbe6\" data-block-id=\"fe1bbe6\"><div class=\"stk-row stk-inner-blocks stk-block-content stk-content-align stk-fe1bbe6-column\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-stackable-column stk-block-column stk-block-column--v3 stk-column stk-block-column--v2 stk-block stk-09cb4b7\" data-block-id=\"09cb4b7\"><style>@media screen and (min-width:690px){.stk-09cb4b7{flex:1 1 calc(41.6% - var(--stk-column-gap,0px) * 1 \/ 2 ) !important}}<\/style><div class=\"stk-column-wrapper stk-block-column__content stk-container stk-09cb4b7-container stk--no-background stk--no-padding\"><div class=\"stk-block-content stk-inner-blocks stk-09cb4b7-inner-blocks\">\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-luminous-vivid-amber-color has-text-color has-fixed-layout\"><tbody><tr><td><strong><span style=\"color: #222222;background-color: var(--theme-palette-color-2, #55a630)\" class=\"stk-highlight\">Non-diagnostic Fragments<br>(12)<\/span><br><br>Broken tips (3), mid-sections (2), and other pieces (8) were recovered from LAK-76.  Both of the Konocti obsidian pieces were in this category.<\/strong><\/td><td>No Images<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong><span style=\"color: #222222;background-color: var(--theme-palette-color-2, #55a630)\" class=\"stk-highlight\">Rattlesnake Corner-notched (2) [300 B.P.]<\/span><br><br>These are small points,<br>most likely for arrows, and the most recent of the styles of points recovered<br>(0-158, 266). &nbsp;They had<br>mean hydration readings of 1.9 and 2 microns respectively indicating<br>manufacture around 300<br>years B.P.<\/strong><\/td><td><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"200\" height=\"228\" class=\"wp-image-591\" style=\"width: 200px;\" src=\"https:\/\/wolfcreekarcheology.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/Chippe4-1.jpg\" alt=\"\"><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong><span style=\"color: #222222;background-color: var(--theme-palette-color-2, #55a630)\" class=\"stk-highlight\">Excelsior Serrated (2)<br>[900-1,300 B.P.]<\/span><br><br>These points had rounded<br>contracting stems and often serrated edges. &nbsp;Points 0-22 and 0-129 had mean hydration readings of 3.2 and 3.7, indicating<br>manufacture ~900 and<br>1,300 B.P.<\/strong><\/td><td><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"200\" height=\"272\" class=\"wp-image-592\" style=\"width: 200px;\" src=\"https:\/\/wolfcreekarcheology.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/Chippe5-1.jpg\" alt=\"\"><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong><span style=\"color: #222222;background-color: var(--theme-palette-color-2, #55a630)\" class=\"stk-highlight\">Mendocino Contracting<br>Stem (1) [1,800 B.P.]<\/span><br><br>These contracting stem and sometimes flat-based points have a slight shoulder just below the cutting edge. &nbsp;Point H6-50 had a mean hydration reading of 4.4 microns indicating manufacture ~1,800 B.P.<\/strong><\/td><td><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"180\" height=\"380\" class=\"wp-image-595\" style=\"width: 180px;\" src=\"https:\/\/wolfcreekarcheology.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/Chippe6-1.jpg\" alt=\"\"><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong><span style=\"color: #222222;background-color: var(--theme-palette-color-2, #55a630)\" class=\"stk-highlight\">Willow Leaf (2)<br>[2,000-2,300 B.P.]<\/span><br><br>These are often thick knife-like points (0-26, 227). &nbsp;Point 0-26 had a hydration mean of 4.9 and 0-227 had a hydration mean of 4.6 indicating manufacture ~2,300 and 2,000 years B.P.<\/strong><\/td><td><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"200\" height=\"215\" class=\"wp-image-593\" style=\"width: 200px;\" src=\"https:\/\/wolfcreekarcheology.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/Chippe7-1.jpg\" alt=\"\"><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong><span style=\"color: #222222;background-color: var(--theme-palette-color-2, #55a630)\" class=\"stk-highlight\">Houx Serrated (5) [2,500\/<br>2,800\/2,900 B.P.]<\/span><br><br>These long contracting-stem points are often serrated and sometimes have ears or tangs at the shoulder. &nbsp;Point 0-151 had a mean hydration reading of 5.2 microns indicating<br>manufacture ~2,500 B.P. &nbsp;<br>Item 0-112 had two bands<br>suggesting the reuse of an<br>older tool. &nbsp;One band was<br>8.7 microns indicating<br>manufacture ~7,200 B.P.<br>and one was 5.5 microns<br>indicating secondary use<br>~2,900 B.P. &nbsp;Item 0-237 had a reading of 5.4<br>indicating manufacture<br>~2,800 B.P<\/strong><\/td><td><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"200\" height=\"154\" class=\"wp-image-594\" style=\"width: 200px;\" src=\"https:\/\/wolfcreekarcheology.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/Chippe8-1.jpg\" alt=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/wolfcreekarcheology.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/Chippe8-1.jpg 314w, https:\/\/wolfcreekarcheology.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/Chippe8-1-300x230.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 200px) 100vw, 200px\" \/><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong><span style=\"color: #222222;background-color: var(--theme-palette-color-2, #55a630)\" class=\"stk-highlight\">Flat Base (1) [2,700 B.P.]<\/span><br><br>The base of this point was<br>squared off by pressure<br>flaking to create a thin, flat base. &nbsp;Its hydration reading was 5.4 microns indicating manufacture ~2,700 B.P.<\/strong><\/td><td><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"160\" height=\"341\" class=\"wp-image-596\" style=\"width: 160px;\" src=\"https:\/\/wolfcreekarcheology.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/Chippe9-1.jpg\" alt=\"\"><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong><span style=\"color: #222222;background-color: var(--theme-palette-color-2, #55a630)\" class=\"stk-highlight\">Unidentifiable Style (1)<br>[3,900 B.P.]<\/span><br><br>Point 0-175 resembled a<br>Mendocino side-notched<br>point and had a single<br>hydration rim of 6.4 microns indicating<br>manufacture ~3,900 B.P.<\/strong><\/td><td><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"150\" height=\"271\" class=\"wp-image-597\" style=\"width: 150px;\" src=\"https:\/\/wolfcreekarcheology.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/Chippe10-1.jpg\" alt=\"\"><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong><span style=\"color: #222222;background-color: var(--theme-palette-color-2, #55a630)\" class=\"stk-highlight\">Concave Base (1) [4,600<br>B.P.]<\/span><br><br>This long point (0-392)<br>had a shallow concave base and a mean hydration reading of 7 microns<br>indicating manufacture<br>~4,600 B.P.<\/strong><\/td><td><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"150\" height=\"218\" class=\"wp-image-598\" style=\"width: 150px;\" src=\"https:\/\/wolfcreekarcheology.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/Chippe11-1.jpg\" alt=\"\"><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong><span style=\"color: #222222;background-color: var(--theme-palette-color-2, #55a630)\" class=\"stk-highlight\">Borax Lake Notched<br>Widestem (1) [4,700 B.P.]<\/span><br><br>When discovered, it was<br>thought that this would be<br>the oldest point recovered<br>during the project. &nbsp;The 7<br>micron reading from this<br>point suggests manufacture ~4,700 B.P.<\/strong><\/td><td><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"150\" height=\"218\" class=\"wp-image-599\" style=\"width: 150px;\" src=\"https:\/\/wolfcreekarcheology.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/Chippe12-1.jpg\" alt=\"\"><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong><span style=\"color: #222222;background-color: var(--theme-palette-color-2, #55a630)\" class=\"stk-highlight\">Flat-Base Dart (1) [5,100<br>B.P.]<\/span><br><br>This point resembled the<br>small excelsior style dart<br>point described by many<br>base is flattened and thinned. &nbsp;The thin base<br>profile more closely<br>resembles a Mostin point. &nbsp;<br>The hydration reading also<br>resembles a Mostin point<br>with a mean micron reading of 7.3 indicating manufacture ~5,100 B.P.<\/strong><\/td><td><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"150\" height=\"283\" class=\"wp-image-601\" style=\"width: 150px;\" src=\"https:\/\/wolfcreekarcheology.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/Chippe13-1.jpg\" alt=\"\"><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong><span style=\"color: #222222;background-color: var(--theme-palette-color-2, #55a630)\" class=\"stk-highlight\">Mendocino Corner- notched (1) [7,000 B.P.]<\/span><br><br>These flat-based square and expending-stemmed points (0-309) sometimes have pronounced corner notches but often don\u2019t. &nbsp;This one had a hydration mean of 8.6 microns indicating manufacture around 7,000 B.P.<\/strong><\/td><td><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"150\" height=\"253\" class=\"wp-image-602\" style=\"width: 150px;\" src=\"https:\/\/wolfcreekarcheology.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/Chippe14-1.jpg\" alt=\"\"><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong><span style=\"color: #222222;background-color: var(--theme-palette-color-2, #55a630)\" class=\"stk-highlight\">Mendocino Side-notched<br>(1) <\/span><span style=\"color: #222222;background-color: #f34957\" class=\"stk-highlight\">[14,200 B.P.]<\/span><br><br>Point 0-107 appears to have been serrated, side<br>notched, and may be the<br>result of several periods of use and reuse. &nbsp;Three<br>hydration bands were<br>observed on this specimen. &nbsp;The widest rim had a mean of 12.2 microns indicating<br>original manufacture around 14,200 B.P. &nbsp;The<br>next rim had a mean of 8.2<br>microns indicating<br>additional work around<br>6,400 B.P. &nbsp;The smallest<br>rim had a reading of 4.6<br>microns indicating further work around 2,000 B.P. &nbsp;Other serrated point<br>forms (see Houx Serrated<br>listed above) are in the<br>2,000-year&nbsp;range.<\/strong><\/td><td><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"150\" height=\"259\" class=\"wp-image-603\" style=\"width: 150px;\" src=\"https:\/\/wolfcreekarcheology.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/Chippe15-1.jpg\" alt=\"\"><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong><span style=\"color: #222222;background-color: var(--theme-palette-color-2, #55a630)\" class=\"stk-highlight\">Flat-base Widestem (1)<\/span><br><span style=\"color: #222222;background-color: #f34957\" class=\"stk-highlight\">[14,200 B.P.]<\/span><br><br>This point (0-108) was a<br>barely-worked flake that<br>resembled a Borax Lake<br>widestem. &nbsp;It had a single<br>hydration band with a mean of 12.2 microns indicating manufacture around 14,200 B.P.<\/strong><\/td><td><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"150\" height=\"272\" class=\"wp-image-604\" style=\"width: 150px;\" src=\"https:\/\/wolfcreekarcheology.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/Chippe16-1.jpg\" alt=\"\"><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-stackable-column stk-block-column stk-block-column--v3 stk-column stk-block-column--v2 stk-block stk-36ec0c8\" data-block-id=\"36ec0c8\"><style>@media screen and (min-width:690px){.stk-36ec0c8{flex:1 1 calc(58.4% - var(--stk-column-gap,0px) * 1 \/ 2 ) !important}}<\/style><div class=\"stk-column-wrapper stk-block-column__content stk-container stk-36ec0c8-container stk--no-background stk--no-padding\"><div class=\"stk-block-content stk-inner-blocks stk-36ec0c8-inner-blocks\">\n<p class=\"has-palette-color-8-color has-text-color\"><strong><span style=\"color: #222222;background-color: var(--theme-palette-color-2, #55a630)\" class=\"stk-highlight\">Points<\/span><br><br>Points were chipped on both sides with a very sharp (unused) cutting edge. &nbsp;Points were sorted based on the key proposed by Greg White (White 1984:125) during his work at LAK-510 in the Anderson Marsh State Historic Park. &nbsp;Samples of each recognized style were submitted for hydration analysis. &nbsp;All but three of the points were of Borax Lake obsidian, 2 were Konocti obsidian and one was Napa obsidian. The points are listed here in order of their hydration readings (most recent to oldest). There were 32 points recovered during project monitoring. &nbsp;<br><br>All obsidian chipped stone tools that appeared to have diagnostic shapes were submitted for hydration analysis. &nbsp;Hydration readings were converted to approximate years B.P. (Before Present) using Thomas Origer&#8217;s (1993) rate for Napa obsidian and the Borax Lake\/Napa obsidian conversion factor developed by Kim Tremaine and Dave Fredrickson (1988).<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-palette-color-8-color has-text-color\"><strong><span style=\"color: #222222;background-color: #f34957\" class=\"stk-highlight\">Bow and Arrow (300 B.P. and later)<\/span><br><br>The small points used to tip arrows are evidence of the most recent hunting technology. &nbsp;The arrow points recovered had hydration dates of 300 B.P.<br><br>Many people assume that the development and use of new technologies provide a population with additional food resources or make resource procurement easier. &nbsp; Mark Cohen and others are more inclined to view the introduction of new technologies as a \u201cmeans of approximating as closely as possible the old status quo in the face of our ever-increasing (population) numbers.\u201d (Cohen 1977:285)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-text-align-left has-palette-color-8-color has-text-color\"><strong><span style=\"color: #222222;background-color: #f34957\" class=\"stk-highlight\">Dart and Atlatl (5,000 B.P. and later)<\/span><\/strong><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"220\" height=\"99\" class=\"wp-image-584\" style=\"width: 220px;\" src=\"https:\/\/wolfcreekarcheology.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/Chippe29-1.gif\" alt=\"\"><strong><br><br>As with most changes in technology, the addition of a new technology adds to, rather than replaces, a previous technology. \u00a0The small thin-based dart point with a hydration date of 5,100 B.P. most likely tipped a short spear or dart. \u00a0This short spear or dart would have been launched at prey with the help of a throwing stick (atlatl). \u00a0This new hunting technology did not replace the thrusting spear, but was used alongside it. \u00a0Point sizes indicate that both technologies were likely in use from 5,000 B.P. till the time of European arrival.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-text-align-left has-palette-color-8-color has-text-color\"><strong><span style=\"color: #222222;background-color: #f34957\" class=\"stk-highlight\">Thrusting Spears (14,000 to 900 B.P.)<\/span><br><br>The largest points were most likely the tips of long thrusting spears. &nbsp;Hydration data suggest that these types of spears were in use from 14,000 B.P. through 900 B.P.<br><br>Throughout this extensive period of time, changes in form and style are evident. &nbsp;A range of different base and notch styles can be found until about 4,000 B.P.   These included square bases, concave bases, notched bases, and side notching. &nbsp;None of these styles included serrated edges.<br><br>Beginning about 4,000 B.P. serrated edges are found among many point styles and most point bases are rounded or contracting in shape.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/wolfcreekarcheology.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/Chippe30-1.gif\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-587\" width=\"546\" height=\"290\"\/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-palette-color-8-color has-text-color\"><strong>hydration means suggests a major increase in the number of points in the 2,000 to 4,000 B.P. time period (5 and 6 micron range) as well as a possible increase in the 6,400 to 7,000 B.P. period (9 micron range). &nbsp;It is known that the most recent volcanic eruption in the Lake Basin occurred ~3,200 B.P. &nbsp;The stresses this event had on food resources may have required an intensification of hunting, which would explain the increase in points during this period.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p> <\/p>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div>\n<\/div><\/div>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div>\n<\/div><\/div>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Elem Points Non-diagnostic Fragments(12) Broken tips (3), mid-sections (2), and other pieces (8) were recovered from LAK-76. Both of the Konocti obsidian pieces were in this category. No Images Rattlesnake Corner-notched (2) [300 B.P.] These are small points,most likely for arrows, and the most recent of the styles of points recovered(0-158, 266). &nbsp;They hadmean hydration [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-480","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"blocksy_meta":{"styles_descriptor":{"styles":{"desktop":"","tablet":"","mobile":""},"google_fonts":[],"version":6}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/wolfcreekarcheology.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/480","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/wolfcreekarcheology.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/wolfcreekarcheology.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wolfcreekarcheology.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wolfcreekarcheology.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=480"}],"version-history":[{"count":13,"href":"https:\/\/wolfcreekarcheology.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/480\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":614,"href":"https:\/\/wolfcreekarcheology.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/480\/revisions\/614"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/wolfcreekarcheology.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=480"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}